Social Kinds, Reference, and Meta-Ontological Revisionism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reference, Truth, and Biological Kinds
This paper examines causal theories of reference with respect to how plausible an account they give of non-physical natural kind terms such as ‘gene’ as well as of the truth of the associated theoretical claims. I first show that reference fixism for ‘gene’ fails. By this, I mean the claim that the reference of ‘gene’ was stable over longer historical periods, for example, since the classical p...
متن کاملBare Singular Reference to Kinds
According to Chierchia 1998, languages where nouns are marked for number and definiteness are not expected to have bare singular nouns which denote kinds. Hebrew has such examples, so far unnoted, yet the present paper shows it can be accomodated within a semantic typology. I disagree with Schmitt and Munn 1999, who conclude on the basis of similar examples in Brazilian Portuguese that they ref...
متن کاملReference to Kinds across Languages
NPs occurring in canonical argumental positions) from a crosslinguistic point of view. It is proposed that languages may vary in what they let their NPs denote. In some languages (like Chinese), NPs are argumental (names of kinds) and can thus occur freely without determiner in argument position; in others they are predicates (Romance), and this prevents NPs from occurring as arguments, unless ...
متن کاملConstructive Empiricism, Observability, and Three Kinds of Ontological Commitment
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observability is not an adequate criterion as a guidance of cautious ontological commitment. My argument is in two stages. First, I argue that constructive empiricist choice of observability as a criterion for ontological commitment is based on the assumption that belief in the existence of unobservable...
متن کاملBare NP’s, Reference to Kinds, and Incorporation
This paper deals with differences between Hindi bare nominals in the availability of existential readings and the possibility of discourse anaphora. Hindi bare singulars are more restricted than bare plurals in both respects. These differences are discussed in light of two questions that are of relevance beyond the facts of Hindi. Is reference to kinds a mediating factor in object level quantif...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Social Ontology
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2196-9663
DOI: 10.1515/jso-2018-0013